Jack Mislinski

Jack Mislinski

Physiologist · Researcher · Builder

I research bioinformatics/omics and physiology tech, build tools at the intersection of physiology and machine learning, and write about training, metabolic health, and how the science actually plays out in a life. Funspan is the framework tying it together.

Company

Aevox

CPET interpretation software for performance and clinical labs. Reinterprets raw breath-by-breath data into a defensible clinical report — thresholds, substrate use, glycogen modeling, economy. In pilot at Hybl Performance Center.

aevox.health →

Products

Funspan

Coach-first longitudinal physiology dashboard. Metabolic efficiency, economy, and fatigue resistance tracked over time.

funspan.health →

Fyool

Personalized endurance fuel — dual-source carbs and electrolytes formulated from your CPET data. Your numbers on the label.

Research Tools

bioML

Predicting metabolic substrate use — VO₂, RER, fat and carbohydrate oxidation — from consumer wearable signals. Physiology-grounded ML.

More →

Longevity Biomarker Heat Map

135 biomarkers, 519 evidence cells linking labs to mortality, CVD, dementia, frailty. Citation-backed, open source.

GitHub →

In preparation · Mislinski et al.

Mitochondrial oxidative capacity outpaces redox buffering during endurance training

A sex-dimorphic thermodynamic-framework analysis of the MoTrPAC rat endurance training dataset. 85 redox-relevant genes, 42,770 observations across 19 tissues, 5 omic layers, 4 training time points. Redox buffering scales significantly sub-linearly with electron transport system expansion in both sexes — with distinct quality-control architectures (mtUPR / mitophagy in males, AMPK in females).

In preparation · Mislinski & Subudhi

Validation of the MGC Diagnostics Meridian Metabolic Cart against the Douglas bag method during maximal-intensity treadmill exercise

First published independent validation of the MGC Meridian, and the first MGC-vs-Douglas comparison during maximal treadmill running. Nine athletes, 17 paired observations, Bland–Altman across VE, VO₂, VCO₂, RER. Headline: the cart overestimates VO₂ by 6.5% (p<0.001) and underestimates RER by 4.6% (p<0.001) at maximal effort — a non-trivial bias for any lab using MGC for VO₂max-based decisions.

Funspan Five

Five ideas on biology, psychology, and training, every week. Free.

Subscribe →